BrianC
Well known member
Actually, we know there has to be a God because things exist. Like the saying, "I think, therefore I am." So that's a simple one.When we say God, that's according to me an belief or concept itself. When we say God is real, how do you know, what or who is God, what is real and why? The word God is in itself a learned concept we get from any source around us. We constantly interpreting reality around us based on beliefs that are not our own and we not even sure if they are true or not. What do we actually mean when we say God, how do you define it. We say he, or some say she or both, but we're projecting our own concepts upon something or somebody. Maybe its not an somebody but something beyond what we can grasp at our current state of understanding.
Conceptualizing God is another matter entirely. We do the best we can with that, and that will depend on how we're influenced by our religion while growing up. Nothing we can do about that. god is neither male nor female. Gender has to do with procreation. A God who creates everything doesn't procreate with another God--He/It just creates a child by willing it. The reason God presents Himself as a male to the Hebrews is because of the way He built males to be strong protectors and the authority figure of the family. The man's authority is mainly due to his being built for protection. God's conveying strength and protection for His children (mankind). That's all. But both genders share aspects of His nature. Anyone who believes in male and female gods hasn't thought that through very well. lol
Regarding the idea of God being given to us and not being our own, that's actually not always the case. Researchers found remote tribes throughout the years, untouched by civilization. Some of those tribes had no religion whatsoever. So they asked the children if they believed there was something or someone out there greater than all of us (I forget how they worded the question). The children always answered yes and said it was because they saw that things were created and someone had to have created them. I believe they also commented that they felt or sensed God, as well. One remote village in India was found by Catholic missionaries. So the missionaries stayed. They learned that there was no crime in the village and everyone was extremely loving and kind. The people didn't "sin," as a Christian would say. And yet as the Catholic missionaries taught the people about God, sin began creeping into their society. After several years, their society devolved greatly. Why? Because they were introduced to the religious concept of good and bad, right and wrong, which created shame. And once shame gets in your heart, it drives you to want to sin to get away from the feeling. That's all sin is--an attempt to avoid the way you feel because you don't like or accept it at that moment. Those people had no shame before. The Ancient Hebrews were like that. They didn't have a concept of good and bad, right and wrong. To them, it was all about function and dysfunction, and shame and honor--Eastern concepts. The whole world was Eastern philosophy before 585 B.C. when the sophists introduced Western philosophy. So Christians are trying to understand an Eastern philosophy way of life (or religion, sort of) through Western philosophy concepts. That doesn't work too well. That's why they misunderstand a lot of things in the Bible and come up with false doctrines as a result. But anyway, the kids knew there was a God naturally. And that's exactly what the Bible says, that everyone knows there's a God because they see creation, just as those kids said.
You stated that maybe God isn't a somebody but rather a something. That's actually not possible. The fact that there is intelligence within our creation means an intelligent entity must have created it. One cannot create something greater than himself and his own intellect. If something creates then it has personality. Therefore, it is not a non-personal "thing." It has to be a person.
Thats an interpretation as well or an belief. I do see that people that have had spiritual experiences mention something similar, but then again are those experiences a reflection of their deep seated beliefs. Like people in NDE's meet beings that reflect their religious beliefs. Like Christians see a being of light and its jesus, buddhist see buddha etc.
Nevertheless, i do start to see through the present process through direct experience that whats happening outside me is a reflection of the content of my own mind, that is beliefs, emotions etc. Also when the emotions or beliefs are dealt with something else will be reflected outside me. Who is creating those situations, The Self, Soul, God or what? If other people are send to us to reflect whats inside us, that indeed means we're all like actors directed by a choreographer, whatever or whoever that is. Is that the purpose of life, or are there many other purposes why we are here?
Maybe we just don't know enough about reality or the nature of consciousness that we can't afford to have definitive answers, but instead of answers we should keep questioning.
I don't see a problem with conceptualizing reality as best we can, but questioning things should be a constant. If we don't conceptualize, we won't grasp things at all. Concepts at least help us grasp God and reality to some degree. But yes, questioning is something I constantly do. Testing and questioning. That's why I discovered and proved that some Christian doctrines are incorrect.
Buddhists actually see something very similar to what Christians see in NDEs. Here's a quote from a PhD who researchers NDEs among people of different religions:
______EXCERPT from Religious Interpretations of Death, Afterlife & NDEs_______
Becker (1984) comments "that ancient Japanese Buddhist meditative and deathbed visions closely parallel modern American near-death and deathbed visions" (p. 51). The Tibetan Book of the Dead (1973) describes the Bardo, the three stages of the transitionary "disembodied state" following death. In the first stage, the departed have visions of the "Blinding Clear Light of Pure Reality." In the second stage, the departed encounter a succession of "deities." In the third stage the departed is judged based upon past deeds by the "Dharma Raja, King and Judge of the Dead." These stages are similar in content to other reported near-death experiences from other religions and cultures. These similarities include a movement through levels - such as passing through a tunnel, visions of pure light, meeting incorporeal beings, powers of astral projections or out-of-body-experience, and a judgment about one's life.
______END OF EXCERPT_______
The main difference we see in the tellings of NDEs from different cultures is how they interpret the things they saw. They're seeing the same things, generally speaking, as evidenced above, but they can only describe things in terms they understand. So an American who's Christian can only describe what he or she saw using words and concepts he or she understands. Christians understand God and Jesus and Heaven, etc., while Buddhists would use different terms for those same beings or places.
I think that's the most important message in the Bible, but people are people, we like to organize reality because otherwise our minds don't feel safe. So people keep creating belief systems aka religions. Part of it is also control, Not only from the powers that be, but most people. People feel threatened when somebody else beliefs something totally different and don't feel safe, so we start manipulating other people to make them believe what we do.
I think that's the core problem of humanity, we identify with our beliefs, we think that;s who we are, our identities, a set of beliefs, emotions etc. But i think we are not, we are awareness that have lost our true identity, our soul, self, or godspark or whatever you might call it. Maybe the buddhist were more close to it, but like most people, they again made an religion out of it. I feel God, Self or whatever sends us special people to point us back to the truth, like jesus, buddha etc, but then the mind is getting in the way and starts interpreting it and we end up with religions again. also the powers that be, don't like it that people are really free, because that threatens their power.
Regarding Jesus being equated with Buddha or any other religious figure, that's hard to do. Jesus is the only one of them who claimed to be God Himself and die for the sins of the world. In Ancient Egypt, there was a savior figure and gods, but they're pretty twisted and their form of saving is quite a bit different than Jesus. We can't prove those people lived where as we have exceptional proof that Jesus lived.
Thats why i listen more to people that had authentic spiritual experiences, especially people that were not involved in any religion, new age, or philosophical systems.
Even though they say they aren't involved in a religion, it doesn't mean they aren't a Jesuit priest operative or a satanic ritual abuse victim who's multiple and programmed to mislead people. Totally depends. I keep a very healthy dose of skepticism in mind at all times.
I see what you're saying but also that psychologist has its own set of beliefs and interprets those experiences accordingly.
Yes, but psychologists are trained to remove their beliefs from the equation and just look at the facts. But at the same time, there's a lot of psychologists out there who still define things through the way they see the world. And the field of psychology has a lot of corruption and control in it, unfortunately. I do tend to trust the NDE researching psychologist a bit more than others, though. They seem more authentic and level headed.
Yes i seen several of those near death experiences an what i noticed is that some of the persons were toured around hell with a being they identified as jesus and showed more compassion towards those souls there then the being identified as jesus. I feel indeed its there to instill fear into people and gives a false image of God or whatever is the organizing principle of reality. I always think to myself, if people don't belief that i don't exist, would i put them in hell to be tortured there for eternity. If people don't belief i exist then good on them, makes me laugh, but would that be a reason to torture them forever, definitely no. So how can a being or God that is unconditional love do that? that just makes sense.
Also indeed, the people that had those experiences can be experiencing the reflections of their own inner state, like here on earth when you are deeply troubled inside you experience a deeply troubled outside. Makes more sense that hell is a state of being in the non-physical world, reflected as a thought reflective environment where you spent time till you dealt with it and then naturally you move on to a more loving environment.
Yeah, all of those NDEs where someone like Jesus or Moses takes someone on a tour of Hell are always fake. They have none of the hallmarks of NDEs and they're usually pushing some religious agenda. The 23 Minutes in Hell book is clearly designed to promote a scary Hell.
What clued me in to the fact that Hell wasn't eternal was the fact that if I were born in another country in a different religion, I wouldn't know Jesus. When I realized that, I felt like God was asking me, "From what you know of Me, do you think I'd make anyone suffer forever?" I immediately thought, "No." So I started researching the translation of "eternal" and quickly found that it doesn't mean eternal. Didn't take me long to prove Hell was something very different than religion thinks it is and functions very different than we think it does. Doesn't make sense for anyone to suffer forever for choices he made during his life which were shaped solely by where he was born, how he was raised, etc. Hell isn't to punish anyone. Punish, in Hebrew, actually means pruning. It's a good thing, a corrective thing. Judgment means virtually the same thing. Those are the two words that describe Hell in the Bible. The word "eternal" actually means "the world to come," and indicates the place we go when we die (the spirit realm).
But yes move on and focus on TPP.
Sounds good. You said there was something on page 14 you wanted to discuss?