invincible
Peer Supporter
Initially every second person that I met would be hearing about TMS and what I know think and believe, and how it's changed my view on the world.
Now, I'm more selective.
Are they open to it? Are they leading with the right questions? How are their questions making me feel?
Especially the last one. If their questions are making me feel irritated or annoyed, I won't go much into detail about personal revelations. I may keep it more superficial or theoretic and not really bring in my own experiences or try to relate these theories with problems they have. I present the fundamentals and then presumably leave it up to them to figure out on their own if they wish to.
If their questions are more curious, more gentle, and I feel calm and more inclined to think they may relate to my personal experiences, I will open up more and say more.
I totally get why Dr. Sarno began screening patients before the TMS lectures on the basis of how open they would be to accepting the diagnosis.
To me, initially it was so obvious. Why wouldn't someone understand this? Why wouldn't someone believe that this was a possibility?
Especially with someone like my dad, it's easy for him to believe that TMS applies to me. But god forbid I suggest some of his issues could be TMS linked. Me? No way! I'm fine! I have all these (insert physical symptoms)
The struggle is more difficult with people I'm closer to, namely the example with my dad that I've given above.
With my mum too, I've learned to not share too much about more personal revelations, because she finds it difficult to understand it from my pov or she can also say that the particular story that I'm mentioning doesn't seem that relevant or significant. Which promptly irritates me, because how are you to judge what is significant to me or not?
So I tend to keep these personal revelations to myself, with regards to speaking to my mum about it.
Which is sometimes tough because there are some people who you chat to regularly, who you can just run your mouth with and just openly chat about things. Who will not give you solutions or advice or their opinions but merely just listen and interject with 'hmms' or 'yea that's cools'
These are the people I am more open with sharing about my experiences with TMS.
No solutions.
No 'this is how I deal with this and maybe you should follow it'
No unsolicited advice.
Just plain ol listening
This seems kind of ironic because I often find myself being the unsolicited advice giver in recent times because I'm so eager to share the information that I have now learned, or am in the process of learning.
Thoughts on how to navigate these situations? Or be more tactful/aware?
I feel like my focus should be as I mentioned above - Ok is this conversation going to drain me and make me feel frustrated or is it going to feel good for both parties?
Another approach I feel is to just depersonalise things.
Why do I take what someone else says as an attack towards me?
Why do interpret information, actions of other people as attacks on me?
How can I look at a situation independent of my own feelings and perspectives?
I feel like this approach of not taking things personally will release me.
Not everything is about me.
Not everything requires an interjection in the frame of, 'oh but for me, this is how it is'
Sometimes (most of the time) things can just be what they are and that's alright.
Now, I'm more selective.
Are they open to it? Are they leading with the right questions? How are their questions making me feel?
Especially the last one. If their questions are making me feel irritated or annoyed, I won't go much into detail about personal revelations. I may keep it more superficial or theoretic and not really bring in my own experiences or try to relate these theories with problems they have. I present the fundamentals and then presumably leave it up to them to figure out on their own if they wish to.
If their questions are more curious, more gentle, and I feel calm and more inclined to think they may relate to my personal experiences, I will open up more and say more.
I totally get why Dr. Sarno began screening patients before the TMS lectures on the basis of how open they would be to accepting the diagnosis.
To me, initially it was so obvious. Why wouldn't someone understand this? Why wouldn't someone believe that this was a possibility?
Especially with someone like my dad, it's easy for him to believe that TMS applies to me. But god forbid I suggest some of his issues could be TMS linked. Me? No way! I'm fine! I have all these (insert physical symptoms)
The struggle is more difficult with people I'm closer to, namely the example with my dad that I've given above.
With my mum too, I've learned to not share too much about more personal revelations, because she finds it difficult to understand it from my pov or she can also say that the particular story that I'm mentioning doesn't seem that relevant or significant. Which promptly irritates me, because how are you to judge what is significant to me or not?
So I tend to keep these personal revelations to myself, with regards to speaking to my mum about it.
Which is sometimes tough because there are some people who you chat to regularly, who you can just run your mouth with and just openly chat about things. Who will not give you solutions or advice or their opinions but merely just listen and interject with 'hmms' or 'yea that's cools'
These are the people I am more open with sharing about my experiences with TMS.
No solutions.
No 'this is how I deal with this and maybe you should follow it'
No unsolicited advice.
Just plain ol listening
This seems kind of ironic because I often find myself being the unsolicited advice giver in recent times because I'm so eager to share the information that I have now learned, or am in the process of learning.
Thoughts on how to navigate these situations? Or be more tactful/aware?
I feel like my focus should be as I mentioned above - Ok is this conversation going to drain me and make me feel frustrated or is it going to feel good for both parties?
Another approach I feel is to just depersonalise things.
Why do I take what someone else says as an attack towards me?
Why do interpret information, actions of other people as attacks on me?
How can I look at a situation independent of my own feelings and perspectives?
I feel like this approach of not taking things personally will release me.
Not everything is about me.
Not everything requires an interjection in the frame of, 'oh but for me, this is how it is'
Sometimes (most of the time) things can just be what they are and that's alright.