It's a process for sure and maybe it would be considered "incurable" however, it IS controllable. Would you rather sit there in agonizing pain, have some unnecessary back surgery, still be in pain and chase some medical cure that isn't there or have the tools to notice what's happening, the tools to address it, and the tools to stop it?? Listen, this isn't something that you get over in an hour simply by accepting it, though that is the first step. You will lock into methods that work for you. As I stated in an earlier post, TMS is the start of the pain, but that's just the beginning. From there the neural pathways build and it becomes as much a fear issue as anything. Different things trigger this. Personally, I can track my first issues with TMS back 40+ years. Embedded issues that have had that long to take over your psyche don't reverse overnight.
Hi Bluesboy,
First I would like to start off by saying that my comments were not intended in any way to impugn your intelligence or motives nor to attempt to diminish whatever suffering you may have encountered along the road of life.
I was simply responding in an honest way to what appear to be your perceptions. In my other post, I was merely making mention of the myriad of questions about TMS that go unanswered, or many times are answered in double talk or by saying "read X book and it will explain everything.
In fact, perhaps you might want to address one of the questions I have posed several times and gotten no response from. For me, it is often the questions that go unanswered that inform you more then the ones that are.
It has been said that the majority of people with TMS have "perfectionist" personalities. Without going into the veracity of the statement, I read that you considered yourself having that type of personality.
I would like to know from you, just how you approach "not caring about your pain", when Alan speaks of "authentic indifference", having to self determine if pain is coming from some structural situation, or, mental process, or, something simply out of reach of your understanding at the moment.
If one does have a perfectionist personality, (and I would consider myself one to some degree), how does one react to unattainable goals such as "not caring about ones pain"? It is the perfect scenario for a perfectionist to continue to attain and so enables the personality rather then moderating it. I have heard others on the site describe this as being a mind trap and I agree.
My questions about "authentic indifference" also go unattended. Who decides when "indifference" is authentic?
What is the way to measure? How could that term be used and apply to the individuals that human beings are? Is it self authenticating? If so, again, it is fuel for the fire for anyone with a perfectionist personality as it implies a perfection of sorts in itself.
When one is experiencing pain, it is a big deal (depending on the severity), to try and access if it is harmful or not. How would one go about this, especially if they have a perfectionist personality and more so, why should they be expected to which the TMS doctrine seems to imply?
BB, I ask these questions in all seriousness, I do not expect an immediate answer to them as I am sure they will require some contemplation, so no rush.
In addition, I am assuming that you were responding to my question "That being the case, why in the world would anyone desire without having substantial documentation to accept that they have an incurable disease or condition? If not set me straight.
When you responded with the following question:
"Would you rather sit there in agonizing pain, have some unnecessary back surgery, still be in pain and chase some medical cure that isn't there or have the tools to notice what's happening, the tools to address it, and the tools to stop it??"
I have not quite grasped your meaning. If, you are saying people will do, say, think almost anything when they are in enough pain, that I can concur with, however, if you are saying that the only way to address the pain in a positive way is to accept that one has an incurable disease or condition of which the cause is themselves, I disagree. Like I have stated many times here, that sort of perception can easily lead to self blaming and removes the focus from the veracity of the theory and places it squarely upon the practitioner of the theory.
Furthermore, I also think that words matter. If you say that:
"It's absolutely possible for old injuries to come back with symptoms. the brain doesn't forget and if you're textbook TMS as you and I are, it will ALWAYS be looking for new ways to attack. This is why it's SO important to develop the tools to be able to notice this for what it is, as soon as possible, so that no new neural pathways are created."
You are being unequivocal. That TMS is a disease or condition without cure.
When you then respond:
"It's a process for sure and maybe it would be considered "incurable" however, it IS controllable."
You then shift to using the word "maybe" and then say it is controllable. You cannot have it both ways. If you do not know if something is incurable or not, how can you determine that it
"IS controllable"?
This quote of yours I can understand and I believe it underscores just what I have been referring to:
"I feel like often we are so consumed with this syndrome and are so consumed with fixing ourselves that it's all we focus on which can be just as damaging. "
As I see it it is the theory that is at fault for enabling that sort of feeling and thinking to occur, not the person.
Thank you for considering what I have to say.