learningmore
Peer Supporter
Disclaimer: I'm codependent and have a narcissist mom, and feel like I have C-PTSD.
Many of them apply to me.
But don't those make people good people? Were everyone to be like this, wouldn't the world be a better place? If everyone put everyone else's needs first, it sounds like that would be awesome. Rather than everyone being a selfish piece of shit.
I'm actually pretty tired of shitty people. No one ever gives a toss what anyone else thinks. "hey, can I dick over this person but benefit myself? IT'S AN EASY CHOICE."
So what, then, is wrong with being a perfectionist, and a goodist, and all the other things?
"When you hear a small thunderstorm do you assume that there will be a tornadoes?"
Yes. It's called being ready. Alternatively you have those leaf-in-the-wind unreliable rotten people who don't give a fuck about anything. Those people ARE SO ANNOYING. They are the anti-maskers. They are the people who litter from their cars because "oh, it's just a wrapper, it doesn't matter." They are the douchebags who play their music too loud while living in an apartment and annoying everyone in surrounding units.
So why do we NOT want to be TMS personality type? Every single person here probably makes the world a better place by their presence. Each person here is probably a polite human being who is a good neighbor. Everybody here is probably awesome and compassionate. What the fuck am I missing?
Sorry for the language, I'm annoyed AF right now and really tired of hearing about how *bad* it is to be compassionate and actually concerned with humans.
Literally the sole thing I can figure that makes being like this bad is that boundary pushing assholes will take advantage of you. AGAIN, THUS PROVING THE PROBLEM IS OTHER PEOPLE NOT BEING LIKE THIS, NOT US BEING LIKE THIS. Summarily, if EVERYBODY was a goodist, for example, the world would be awesome. Can you even imagine? So is the only reason to avoid being a goodist because the collective consciousness of the planet isn't set for it?
Many of them apply to me.
But don't those make people good people? Were everyone to be like this, wouldn't the world be a better place? If everyone put everyone else's needs first, it sounds like that would be awesome. Rather than everyone being a selfish piece of shit.
I'm actually pretty tired of shitty people. No one ever gives a toss what anyone else thinks. "hey, can I dick over this person but benefit myself? IT'S AN EASY CHOICE."
So what, then, is wrong with being a perfectionist, and a goodist, and all the other things?
"When you hear a small thunderstorm do you assume that there will be a tornadoes?"
Yes. It's called being ready. Alternatively you have those leaf-in-the-wind unreliable rotten people who don't give a fuck about anything. Those people ARE SO ANNOYING. They are the anti-maskers. They are the people who litter from their cars because "oh, it's just a wrapper, it doesn't matter." They are the douchebags who play their music too loud while living in an apartment and annoying everyone in surrounding units.
So why do we NOT want to be TMS personality type? Every single person here probably makes the world a better place by their presence. Each person here is probably a polite human being who is a good neighbor. Everybody here is probably awesome and compassionate. What the fuck am I missing?
Sorry for the language, I'm annoyed AF right now and really tired of hearing about how *bad* it is to be compassionate and actually concerned with humans.
Literally the sole thing I can figure that makes being like this bad is that boundary pushing assholes will take advantage of you. AGAIN, THUS PROVING THE PROBLEM IS OTHER PEOPLE NOT BEING LIKE THIS, NOT US BEING LIKE THIS. Summarily, if EVERYBODY was a goodist, for example, the world would be awesome. Can you even imagine? So is the only reason to avoid being a goodist because the collective consciousness of the planet isn't set for it?