Thinking a bit more about this, I suspect that part of what I find so interesting about the book is that love and relationship are so important for being able to live a happy and healthy life. As such, they are relevant to TMS. Steve Ozanich states this well at the very beginning of his book. At the very beginning, before even the table of contents he devotes an entire page to the following quote:
Life Is Relationship
Life is pulling the other person back to you, pulling them toward your heart, pulling the separated hearts back together, that once beat as One.
Everyone needs to be heard in life—to be joined—their stories told, or relationship cannot survive. Those feeling isolated remain lost, life is void, fear and anger are generated by the separation—guilt and self-punishment follow.
Some hearts cut by separation will try to pull the Other back through acquiescence, others will try to pull the One back to them by taking the “opposing side” of the One that separated from them, yet others will seek neutral refuge within themselves—disappearing into routine and self-accomplishment.
The human mind will resort to infinite possibilities in order to gain an advantage in the effort to fulfill this most basic need—to pull the Others back to themselves, closing any separation, in order to avoid the fear of isolation, once again.
Happiness surrounds the need for measured approval, unrequited self-acceptance, and the avoidance of rejection, as Self becomes unto itself; through the pain of each new separation comes a re-birth.
—Steven Ray Ozanich
I remember when I first read the book, I thought a lot about why he put that message in such a prominent location. I guess that it is because we mammals are wired for relationship. When Dr. Sommer Anderson, who worked with Dr. Sarno for 33 years, was a special guest at a teleconference I ran for therapists,
she asked the participants to watch the following video. I think it does a terrific job of showing how much we are wired for what Steve calls relationship, what Love 2.0 calls love, and what therapists for the last century have called attachment:
When the mother interrupts what the book would refer to as the moment of love between the mother and the child, the child simply can't tolerate it.
The standard joke about seeing a therapist is that the therapist says, "So, tell me about your mother," right? When the mother deprives the child of her loving engagement in the video, above, you can see why. You can see why we spend so much time journaling about our parents - that early attachment has large effects on our youthful plastic minds (couldn't resist!) and therefore has important consequences down the line. Break out the journal!
Psychologists refer to the feelings that one person develops for another as "attachment," and have made it a major topic of study in psychotherapeutic research over the last 120 years. So when Dr. Sommer-Anderson gave the keynote at the 22nd Bowlby conference, she entitled it "Unlocking Pain - Disrupted
Attachment and Chronic Physical Pain" I.e., "tell me about your mother, or whoever you had disrupted attachment with." (Dr. Sommer Anderson is a psychoanalyst, which is the type of therapist most known for "tell me about your mother.")
... and here is where things get more personal ... I hope that what I'm about to discuss isn't Too Much Information, but I figure that this is a TMS forum, and if we don't take some risks, the discussions will get stale and we will stop learning from one another. (Thank goodness for newbies, though, to keep it fresh.) In terms of taking that risk, I hope I'm leading by example.
I know that my early attachment was disrupted when my mother died at age 9. I knew that she was going to die before that, and that probably affected the way I bonded with her as well.

That's in the past, of course, and I can't do much about it now, but my TMS journaling has taught me that it probably had some strong effects throughout my life. I'm not thrilled about that fact, but it's something I have to live with.
I used to be fairly alexithymic (not in touch with my feelings), and through concerted effort, I've gotten better at that (primarily through mindfulness - just deliberately paying attention to them). I don't want to get too TMI, but perhaps that had something to do with my mother as well. In a similar vein I tend to be optimistic, and if her death affected my "attachment style," perhaps some lovingkindness meditation or some of Dr. Fredrickson's other exercises could help. We've all seen study after study about how meditation changes the brain via brain plasticity. Why not give it a try?
In general, I'm just loving this book because it's a good book and because it makes a fascinating subject very accessible. But this history does make it particularly interesting as well.
Thanks for reading!
Finally, one last video from Dr. Sommer Anderson that really shows how us mammals are wired for love