You’re more than welcome my dear. You may also gain something from reading the link I referenced in my response to Syl. I’m not sure if you’ve read it as you reference ‘the grail’ but if not, your intuition is on form.
https://www.tmswiki.org/forum/threads/seeking-the-grail.529/ (Steven Ozanich - Seeking the Grail)
I’ve read your introductory post on another thread and note the question you raise there. Read the Steve Ozanich post and then share your thoughts because I think his words may help you tease it out a bit more.
Plum x
You were right - that was extraordinarily helpful! Thank you. It allowed me to tie together my understanding a little more. I'd be lying if I said I understood fully, but really, do any of us? Do we need to? Probably not. I think I'm beginning to become sharper in recognising my own defence mechanisms, which I'm going to recognise as a sign of progress. I also feel that when I recognise my defence mechanisms in action, it becomes easier to practice outcome independence. Not sure why, but I'm not going to think too deeply about it - I'm doing enough of that!
Anyway, from what I understand, both from Steve's post and my general reading, there are effectively two mechanisms at work here:
1) The initial mechanism of repression, which occurs when people internalise their anger and put pressure on the self. This mechanism, as Steve notes, is constructed from early life experiences. How we first escape the lion informs how we'll attempt to escape it further down the line. Classic behaviourism.
2) The mechanism of pain re-production, initially activated/triggered by the internalised anger build-up reaching critical mass, and then sustained by the anxiety and fear one experiences in response to pain/symptoms, creating an infinite feedback loop.
The first mechanism applies to everyone - we all have ways of reacting to anger/negative emotion - but some people will try to attempt to escape the lion differently than we (TMS'ers) do. By going outward rather than inward, for instance, hence the non-activation of symptoms. In other words, their mechanism of anger/emotion processing is different, and doesn't necessarily lead to repression.
If someone were to ask me the 'key' to healing, if such a thing exists, it would be to break the cycle of both mechanisms. The important point here is that the way we get there is different for everyone. As Alan notes in his recovery program, there are so many different days/chapters, because the program is attempting to act as a 'catch-all' to address every factor that might be relevant in pain being sustained. Hence, there are no 'right answers' in breaking these cycles - only suggestions. If I were to speculate on a couple things:
a) Symptom transference, as in, you might have back pain, but then suddenly this disappears, and it's replaced by dizziness, anxiety and weakness, is a product of only breaking cycle 2), and not 1). You may have gotten over your fear of back pain, but you're still repressing day-to-day, and so symptoms pop up elsewhere.
b) The rare instances that Steve references where people are required to excavate and resolve a traumatic incident, such as Helen, are because these instances are mechanisms in and of themselves. As in, Helen's abuse and trauma was so significant, that it was still producing fresh grief, anger and resentment, albeit unknown to her. It was not a 'well of emotion,' so to speak, or a single deposit of old anger that she had to 'uncover,' but a mechanism, re-producing current negative emotion. To break this cycle, she had to re-live her experience, because unless she did, the mechanism would continue to operate. The vast majority of people do not have something so dangerous, so traumatic, in their past, that it continually creates new negative emotion, hence the lack of the need to go 'excavating.'
As someone who is still in the midst of their symptoms, has no background in psychology, and has not healed, I'm hardly the authority on this. But it's where my understanding has led me, at least!