Hello, I have just started the online program here by Alan Gordon and I read the Divided Mind by Sarno before.
I understood from the book that the pain is a protection mechanism by the brain to distract us from other, "more threatening" negative emotions buried in our unconscious. As a result, healing works by identifying these underlying emotions and confronting them.
Gordon on the other hand says in program that the pain is "learned". It continous as a reaction to our fear off the pain. And once we understand that the pain is not dangerous and there is no structural damage, we begin to "heal". I conclude from this that there doesn't have to be a negative trauma in the past.
For me it seems like two different approaches with the common denominator that the pain is caused by the brain. I am struggeling a bit to bring both together . Can someone help me with it?
Thanks a lot.
I understood from the book that the pain is a protection mechanism by the brain to distract us from other, "more threatening" negative emotions buried in our unconscious. As a result, healing works by identifying these underlying emotions and confronting them.
Gordon on the other hand says in program that the pain is "learned". It continous as a reaction to our fear off the pain. And once we understand that the pain is not dangerous and there is no structural damage, we begin to "heal". I conclude from this that there doesn't have to be a negative trauma in the past.
For me it seems like two different approaches with the common denominator that the pain is caused by the brain. I am struggeling a bit to bring both together . Can someone help me with it?
Thanks a lot.