Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dear heart,
The Limbic System. Unconscious, automatic, instinctive. It's our old brain and interestingly the part that governs the whole "my god is bigger than your god" so typical of religions founded on fear.
Old and outdated science. Nobel Laureate Santiago Ramon y Cayal (1953-1934) mistakenly believed that brain cells were unique and couldn't regenerate. Hence the years of indoctrinated bosh you refer to. They were still churning it out when I was a psychology undergraduate.
In 1998 the journal Nature Medicine published a report by Peter Eriksson that demonstrated 'Neurogenesis in the Adult Human Hippocampus." Cue a paradigm shift.
I suppose these discussions rest upon what we mean by the unconscious. For some it is a metaphor, for others it is literally the Autonomic Nervous System. Candace Pert said the body was the unconscious mind. I took a shine to her teachings because she was also a woman of faith and she described us as flickering flames rather than slabs of meat. I admire people who retain that sense of wonder. She also explained how one cell bacterium are hard-wired for bliss. Nature is generous like that.
There are so many things that could be discussed. We could veer into Wittgenstein, Descartes, Descartes Error (Damasio), Damasios Error. We could explore the speculative theories on the origins of consciousness in the bicameral mind a'la Julian Jaynes, we could revel in the beautiful and assured writing of Paul Broks who presents case studies of those who've experienced brain trauma and the "reset of their personality dials."
Ultimately though this whole debate hinges on whether we accept the freudian model of the unconscious (1915) as a cauldron of primitive impulses along with his take on the structure of the psyche and the need for defence mechanisms or whether we choose to reject it either in favour of something like Wilson's adaptive unconscious (2004), or to reject it completely.
Rousseau or Hobbes? Forgive my feminine sentimentality for I'm a romantic. I like wine, music and song. I will always prefer poetry and mystery over facts and hard science but I don't find my faith or sense of awe is diminished by the explanations of those who look more closely. Instead I find it enriched.
I am pagan and am quite used to the feeling of others trampling over my faith with man-made ideas so I do sympathise. I shall close with one of my favourite quotes from one of my favourite authors:
"Oh what a catastrophe, what a maiming of love when it was a personal, merely personal feeling, taken away from the rising and setting of the sun, and cut off from the magic connection of the solstice and equinox. This is what is the matter with us. We are bleeding at the roots, because we are cut off from the earth and sun and stars, and love is a grinning mockery, because, poor blossom, we plucked it from its stem on the tree of Life, and expected it to keep on blooming in our civilised vase on the table."
~ D.H. Lawrence
Or as Freud simply stated, "Civilisation is madness."
This forum is a discussion forum, not only a panel of pain travelers giving encouragement to one another and advice on good books to read.
You don't like my ideas, but why would that necessitate my silence?
I agree with what Doctor Sarno said regarding his own new diagnosis. That his diagnosis will be appropriated by hordes of newly minted mindbody specialists, be they neurologists, brain surgeons, or dog catchers with a hobby of neuroplasticity, and the diagnosis of a psychologically induced physical disorder will be fractured and confusing to people.
If one theory enhanced by confidence your brain has built a new neural learned pathway after your birth that caused your pain suits you better, more power to you.
I prefer Doctor Sarno who says TMS is universal. We inherited the process by evolution, and it is triggered, then very soon after the mental conditioning begins. Fear of many things that may bring the dreaded pain back. Knowledge of psychological causation interrupts the decision to initiate a TMS attack when the mind has learned a part of itself was pulling a fast one.
Plum, as always, enjoyed your beautiful writing! May I add to the list of the minds that shaped up our understanding of mindbody many of the Buddhist Tibetan monks, who were thousands years ahead of us in understanding of the relationship between the mind, the body and the pain, that infamous TMS that brought us all together to this forum.
I can empathize with BeWell's views because the medical establishment in America is really failing millions of people at this point in time. However, his posts are a bit too rhetorical and ideological and this could possibly be a turnoff to new users learning about the TMS diagnosis for the first time. Nobody seems to be suggesting that this topic be locked or that BeWell's posts be censored. Some posters are reacting to his posts radically because his posts are quite frankly radical.I believe BeWell has a perfect right to express his views on TMS here and disagree with Drs. Hansom and Schubiner. If they want to rebut, they have the right to come here and participate in the conversation. I take offense to those who wish to quiet his right to express his views on TMS and are name-calling and pressuring to shut him up. BeWell is expressing views on how TMS functions that are helpful to those wanting to understand TMS. He is expressing his views with passion and emotion--I thought that's what TMS was about--expressing passion and emotions and not having to repress and suppress them.
I can empathize with BeWell's views because the medical establishment in America is really failing millions of people at this point in time. However, his posts are a bit too rhetorical and ideological and this could possibly be a turnoff to new users learning about the TMS diagnosis for the first time. Nobody seems to be suggesting that this topic be locked or that BeWell's posts be censored. Some posters are reacting to his posts radically because his posts are quite frankly radical.
Nobody should be free from having their theories be scrutinized and criticized. That includes Hanscom, Schechter, Schubiner and even the undeniably great Dr. Sarno.
I don't agree with all points of view expressed or how they sometimes are written though there is a great deal of openness in this forum that is rare, even for the Internet. Thank you for letting me speak or vent and I too welcome disagreeable views.
I am not. That is a very important position. The breadth of responsibility is tremendous.
I could not agree with you more Man. It is incredible in this time of making movies in high def and sending them across the world with a wireless phone to a friend, in seconds, and the friggin greedy and dumb medical system is systematically hurting people and in many cases killing people with wrong diagnoses, improper treatments, and misplaced trust by a passive public.
We should be infuriated with this gross incompetence and ignoring of Dr. Sarno who has figured out the source of the problem in almost all ailments that are hurting people. Further, Dr. Sarno says unconscious emotions are a factor in every single ailment, except trauma. He's right. We know it because we are living proof!
I am not advocating a revolution. People must use critical thinking and put theories to the test.
I am not an educated person, but in my opinion, Dr. Sarno's books and work is the second most important volume of literature, science, and benefit to humankind if we have the guts to live it. You can guess what is numero uno.