anacoluthon33
Peer Supporter
Hi everyone,
I've arrived at a crossroads. Just wanting a take or two on it.
I've more or less accepted my condition as TMS, even though I'm not really progressing with it and I'm not as proactive as I could be in committing to a program. A large part of me is still "sitting on the fence," as it were.
That said, I'm on the right track in terms of not engaging in "fixing behaviours": I'm not Googling symptoms or cures, I'm not chasing doctors, that kind of thing.
The crossroads I'm at is this. A referral for a neurologist, made over a year and a half ago, finally came up. They called me and booked an appointment for next week. (I'd forgotten all about that referral.) For the record, I've seen multiple specialists over the past few years and I've got a clean bill of health from them all. I've never seen a neurologist before, however, and this would truly be the "last stop"; I wouldn't even know who else to consult after this.
I see the appointment going one of two ways. First, like the other previous appointments, nothing happens, other than I've got a clean bill of health and should get on with my life. Second, the specialist does indeed see something, and the solution is most likely medication of some sort, which I am generally opposed to taking on principle.
Both ways seem to argue that I'm best off cancelling that appointment, and believe me, I fully understand and realize the TMS principle of NOT chasing doctors to validate and fix you. A big part of me sees cancelling next week's appointment as personally empowering, as well as an important step in committing more fully to the mind-body approach.
However—a small part still holds out hope that this is the key, or at least a key, and that cancelling an appointment that was 500 days in the making is foolish, especially if there's a hope of a hope involved.
So, what do you think? Is it silly to take time to go to an appointment where either option isn't really going to change anything? Or is it misguided to downplay that third option, that something could actually happen with this specialist.
Thanks for taking the time to read. Hopefully I've been clear.
I've arrived at a crossroads. Just wanting a take or two on it.
I've more or less accepted my condition as TMS, even though I'm not really progressing with it and I'm not as proactive as I could be in committing to a program. A large part of me is still "sitting on the fence," as it were.
That said, I'm on the right track in terms of not engaging in "fixing behaviours": I'm not Googling symptoms or cures, I'm not chasing doctors, that kind of thing.
The crossroads I'm at is this. A referral for a neurologist, made over a year and a half ago, finally came up. They called me and booked an appointment for next week. (I'd forgotten all about that referral.) For the record, I've seen multiple specialists over the past few years and I've got a clean bill of health from them all. I've never seen a neurologist before, however, and this would truly be the "last stop"; I wouldn't even know who else to consult after this.
I see the appointment going one of two ways. First, like the other previous appointments, nothing happens, other than I've got a clean bill of health and should get on with my life. Second, the specialist does indeed see something, and the solution is most likely medication of some sort, which I am generally opposed to taking on principle.
Both ways seem to argue that I'm best off cancelling that appointment, and believe me, I fully understand and realize the TMS principle of NOT chasing doctors to validate and fix you. A big part of me sees cancelling next week's appointment as personally empowering, as well as an important step in committing more fully to the mind-body approach.
However—a small part still holds out hope that this is the key, or at least a key, and that cancelling an appointment that was 500 days in the making is foolish, especially if there's a hope of a hope involved.
So, what do you think? Is it silly to take time to go to an appointment where either option isn't really going to change anything? Or is it misguided to downplay that third option, that something could actually happen with this specialist.
Thanks for taking the time to read. Hopefully I've been clear.