The SEP suggests that I post about doubts and/or aha moments that I'm experiencing right now.
My main aha, as I have indicated in other posts, is the idea that just recognizing that the symptoms are psychologically caused and deciding to reassert control over yourself is astonishingly empowering and seems to be the key to recovery. This is potentially life altering.
My main doubt, as I've also alluded to, is the logical gap (if I could put it that way) between knowing the cause of your symptoms and getting rid of them. I just read Healing Back Pain, and Sarno himself is candid about the fact that he doesn't know why the knowledge cure works. He says it just does, in case after case of his patients. But what if it doesn't? What if you accept that your symptoms are psychologically caused -- really know that's what's going on -- but the symptoms don't go away? After all, why would just knowing that your physical symptoms are emotionally generated cause them to vanish anyway? What's the theory behind that? If the underlying cause persists, then why wouldn't the physical symptoms also persist? Sarno's idea seems to be that the pain mechanism only works when it's covert, when it is unknown to the conscious mind. As soon as it is revealed, its cover is blown, and it can no longer function. That sounds wonderful, but I wonder if it's really true in all cases. When someone has trouble completely ridding him- or herself of their TMS symptoms, the Sarno diagnosis seems to be that they haven't fully accepted the TMS theory that the symptoms are psychologically caused. I'm sure that's true in many cases, but I wonder if it's true in every case.
Today, I haven't been feeling great. It hasn't been terrible, but I've had some of my typical symptoms: dull ache in the lower back (right side, not a spasm), tightness in the gut, listlessness. Is the presence of these symptoms really due to the fact that, unconsciously, I haven't fully accepted the TMS thesis? That doesn't sound right to me.
Of course I know that Sarno also says that you are supposed to investigate your psyche and try to uncover the anxiety, anger and other negative feelings that are at the root of your physical symptoms. But that's a bit of an inconsistency in the theory, it seems to me, because on the one hand he's saying that all you need to do is understand the mechanism and that will make the symptoms vanish, while on the other he's telling us to go deep into our feelings, both current and ancient, and try to find a link to our current physical symptoms. So which is it? Both, I guess, but I find this part of the theory somewhat unclear.
My main aha, as I have indicated in other posts, is the idea that just recognizing that the symptoms are psychologically caused and deciding to reassert control over yourself is astonishingly empowering and seems to be the key to recovery. This is potentially life altering.
My main doubt, as I've also alluded to, is the logical gap (if I could put it that way) between knowing the cause of your symptoms and getting rid of them. I just read Healing Back Pain, and Sarno himself is candid about the fact that he doesn't know why the knowledge cure works. He says it just does, in case after case of his patients. But what if it doesn't? What if you accept that your symptoms are psychologically caused -- really know that's what's going on -- but the symptoms don't go away? After all, why would just knowing that your physical symptoms are emotionally generated cause them to vanish anyway? What's the theory behind that? If the underlying cause persists, then why wouldn't the physical symptoms also persist? Sarno's idea seems to be that the pain mechanism only works when it's covert, when it is unknown to the conscious mind. As soon as it is revealed, its cover is blown, and it can no longer function. That sounds wonderful, but I wonder if it's really true in all cases. When someone has trouble completely ridding him- or herself of their TMS symptoms, the Sarno diagnosis seems to be that they haven't fully accepted the TMS theory that the symptoms are psychologically caused. I'm sure that's true in many cases, but I wonder if it's true in every case.
Today, I haven't been feeling great. It hasn't been terrible, but I've had some of my typical symptoms: dull ache in the lower back (right side, not a spasm), tightness in the gut, listlessness. Is the presence of these symptoms really due to the fact that, unconsciously, I haven't fully accepted the TMS thesis? That doesn't sound right to me.
Of course I know that Sarno also says that you are supposed to investigate your psyche and try to uncover the anxiety, anger and other negative feelings that are at the root of your physical symptoms. But that's a bit of an inconsistency in the theory, it seems to me, because on the one hand he's saying that all you need to do is understand the mechanism and that will make the symptoms vanish, while on the other he's telling us to go deep into our feelings, both current and ancient, and try to find a link to our current physical symptoms. So which is it? Both, I guess, but I find this part of the theory somewhat unclear.
Last edited: