amanpervaiz
New Member
Hi folks,
This question is for folks who have used either Alan Gordon or Dan Buglio's approach when dealing with pain and have gotten better with dealing/ignoring/lessening pain.
Which one do people prefer?
1.) Dan Buglio's approach is not somatic checkins, but every time you observe pain, try to be indifferent, and if not indifferent try to freak out less. Dan Buglio discourages modalities like massage, heat/cold, pain killers etc.
2.) Alan Gordon's approach is more relaxed in which he encourages Somatic Checkins when the pain is low/medium and modalities/avoidance when pain is too much, rather wait for a better opportunity.
Both advocate getting on with our lives as much as we can without pushing to extreme pain.
For me the pain movies around every hour, and intensifies and becomes low on its own. Sometimes sitting is an issue and not standing. Sometimes its the other way around.
Any advice from veterans would be awesome.
This question is for folks who have used either Alan Gordon or Dan Buglio's approach when dealing with pain and have gotten better with dealing/ignoring/lessening pain.
Which one do people prefer?
1.) Dan Buglio's approach is not somatic checkins, but every time you observe pain, try to be indifferent, and if not indifferent try to freak out less. Dan Buglio discourages modalities like massage, heat/cold, pain killers etc.
2.) Alan Gordon's approach is more relaxed in which he encourages Somatic Checkins when the pain is low/medium and modalities/avoidance when pain is too much, rather wait for a better opportunity.
Both advocate getting on with our lives as much as we can without pushing to extreme pain.
For me the pain movies around every hour, and intensifies and becomes low on its own. Sometimes sitting is an issue and not standing. Sometimes its the other way around.
Any advice from veterans would be awesome.